News
White LEDs: A Cost-Effective Alternative to Red + Far-Red LEDs
September 21, 2022
Many important greenhouse floriculture crops are long-day plants, meaning they require long days and short nights (usually less than 8–10 hours of darkness) to produce flowers early. In areas where winters have short days and long nights, the flowering of long-day plants grown during that time is delayed or inhibited. To shorten long nights and promote flowering of long-day plants, growers can use dim photoperiodic lighting at the end of the day (day-extension lighting) or in the middle of the night (night-break or night-interruption lighting). 16-hour days created from day-extension lighting or 4 hours of night-break lighting are generally sufficient to achieve complete flowering of long-day plants.
In the past decade, “flowering” LED lamps with custom light spectra including red (R) + far-red (FR) light have been commercially available for flowering applications, albeit at high prices. A more affordable option may be white LED lamps, which are mass-produced for general use. Developed for human vision, white LED lamps emit mostly visible red, green, and blue light, but little FR light. There are pros and cons to both, in addition to cost considerations. “Flowering” LED lamps with FR light can result in rapid flowering of some crops like petunia, but may also cause undesired stretching. White LED lamps may be less effective at promoting flowering than LED lamps with FR light, but may produce plants that are more compact.
Experimental design
Plants can be sensitive to R or FR light during different parts of the night, so timing may also play a role in how effective white LED lamps can be at controlling flowering. To investigate the efficacy and optimal timing of white vs. R + FR LED lamps, we performed, and then repeated, an experiment on four long-day plants: coreopsis ‘Early Sunrise,’ snapdragon ‘Liberty Classic Yellow,’ petunia ‘Easy Wave Burgundy Star,’ and petunia ‘Wave Purple Improved.’ We transplanted seedlings into 4-inch pots filled with peat-perlite media and grew them in a greenhouse under nine lighting treatments (Fig. 1). We grew plants under 8-hour short days (control, truncated with black cloth) with or without white or red + far-red (1:1) LED lamps operating for 8 hours after dusk, 8 hours before dawn, 4 hours after dusk + 4 hours before dawn, or 4 hours as a night break(Fig. 2). A digital timer controlled the timing of each lighting treatment. We used layers of aluminum mesh to cover the R + FR LED lamps so that light intensity was similar across all treatments at around 2 μmol·m−2·s−1 with all colors included.
Results
Coreopsis ‘Easy Sunrise’ Plants did not flower under short days but flowered similarly under all lighting treatments (Fig. 3). At flowering, plants grown under white LED lamps were 18%–19% shorter than those grown under R + FR LED lamps.
Snapdragon ‘Liberty Classic Yellow’ Compared to short days, both white and R + FR LED lamps promoted flowering. For 8-hour post-dusk and/or pre-dawn lighting, flowering was 10–20 days later under white LED lamps than under R + FR LED lamps (Fig. 3). However, for 4-hour night-break lighting, flowering was similar under the two lamp types. White LED lamps were most effective as 8-hour pre-dawn lighting. At flowering, white LED lamps increased branching by 30%–122% compared to R + FR LED lamps no matter the timing.
Petunia ‘Easy Wave Burgundy Star’ All lighting treatments promoted flowering compared to short days. Flowering was 10–15 days later under white LED lamps than under R + FR LED lamps (Fig. 3). For both lamp types, flowering was 6–10 days earlier under 8-hour post-dusk and/or pre-dawn lighting than under 4-hour night-break lighting. For 8-hour post-dusk and/or pre-dawn lighting, plants grown under white LED lamps had 54%–86% more branches at flowering than those grown under R + FR LED lamps.
Petunia ‘Wave Purple Improved’ Plants flowered earlier under all lighting treatments compared to short days. For 8-hour post-dusk and/or pre-dawn lighting, plants grown under white LED lamps flowered 13–14 days later compared to R + FR LED lamps (Fig. 3). However, flowering was similar under both lamp types when delivered as 4-hour night-break lighting. For white LED lamps, the light timing did not matter, but under R + FR LED lamps, flowering was faster under 8-hour post-dusk lighting than under 4-hour night-break lighting. Branching was similar under all lighting treatments.
Fig 3.
Takeaways
Our results show that while white LED lamps may not produce flowers as early in FR-sensitive crops such as snapdragon and petunia, they show the potential to improve compactness and branching. They may be a cost-effective photoperiodic lighting option for plants such as coreopsis, that when grown under white LEDs were shorter and flowered similarly to those grown under R + FR LEDs. As for the optimal timing of the different lamps, we found that for white LEDs, flowering of all crops was the earliest when operated for 8 hours before dawn. For R + FR LEDs, 8-hour post-dusk and/or pre-dawn lighting was generally more effective than 4-hour night-break lighting.
Acknowledgments
We thank the American Floral Endowment for funding, Raker-Roberta’s Young Plants for plant material, TotalGrow Lights for R + FR LED lamps, and the University of Delaware greenhouse staff and students for technical and experimental assistance.
By Qingwu (William) Meng, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware
