Postharvest Handling Procedures For Emerging New Specialty Cut Flowers
Postharvest Handling Procedures For
Emerging New Specialty Cut Flowers
Dr. John Dole
North Carolina State University
Executive Summary
Each year a wide variety of new cultivars and
species are made available from plant breeders, propagators, and suppliers and
evaluated in the National Annual and Perennial Cut Flower Trial Programs,
administered by North Carolina State University and the Association of Specialty
Cut Flower Growers (ASCFG). These new cultivars are tested at approximately 35
locations in the United States and Canada, providing valuable production and
marketing information, including yield, stem length, and market ratings.
However, postharvest life, a key component of a successful cut flower cultivar
is not yet evaluated. New species have become a major component of the cut
flower industry but many wholesalers and retailers are obviously reluctant to
handle large number of new cuts until specific postharvest information is
available. Most of the accessible information is on established cut flowers
(Nell et al., 2000); however, the industry also needs postharvest information on
promising species when they first enter the market.
In Stage I, this research will identify new
cultivars with extended postharvest life. Stage II will determine ethylene
sensitivity and optimum cold storage duration, pretreatments and pulses, vase
solutions and substrates, and commercial preservatives for those cultivars.
This new information will substantially decrease
postharvest problems traditionally associated with new specialty cut flowers and
increase the use of specialty cuts in the floriculture industry. This work will
indicate whether a new species is suitable for wholesale marketing or will work
best in direct retail. The need for new and different cut flowers is
increasingly important to stimulate customer interest and sales and to replace
declining production of the major greenhouse cut flower species. Continued
success of the cut flower industry requires postharvest information for new
specialty cut flowers.
Introduction and Literature Review
Commercial cut flower production encompasses an
incredible array of plant materials including fresh and dried/preserved flowers,
stems, and berries. Each year a wide variety of new cultivars and species are
made available from plant breeders, propagators, and suppliers. The National
Annual and Perennial Cut Flower Trial Programs, established in 1993 and
administered by North Carolina State University and the Association of Specialty
Cut Flower Growers (ASCFG), evaluates 50 to 70 new cultivars annually for
greenhouse and field production (Dole 2001 a,b,c). The cultivars are tested at
approximately 35 locations in the United States and Canada, primarily at
commercial cut flower producers, but also at a few universities and cooperative
extension providers. Much useful production and marketing information is
collected, including yield, stem length, and market appreciation ratings.
However, postharvest life, a key component of a successful cut flower cultivar
is not yet evaluated. Many successful new cut flower species, including Campanula
‘Champion’ and Zinnia ‘Benary’s Giant’ were first given
widespread testing and publicity through the trials. New species have become an
important component of the cut flower industry but many wholesalers and
retailers are obviously reluctant to handle large numbers of new cuts until
specific postharvest information is available. Most of the current information
is for traditional cut flowers (Nell et al., 2000); however, this information is
not readily transferable to the many promising new species being evaluated.
Postharvest information specifically tailored to these new species must be
available as they are first entering the markets.
A number of factors must be examined in
developing the optimum postharvest handling procedures for a new cut flower. Cut
flowers vary greatly in their sensitivity to ethylene with symptoms including
leaf, flower and bud abscission, bud abortion, rapid flower senescence, epinasty
and decreased vase life (Nichols, 1966; Woltering and van Doom, 1988).
Concentrations as low as 100 parts per
billion and exposure times as little as four hours can lead to damage of some
species (Abeles, et a!., 1992; L. H??yer, personal
communication).
The ethylene blocker, silver thiosulfate (STS),
was developed as a pretreatment to prevent ethylene damage and gained widespread
acceptance in the cut flower industry (Beyer, 1976; Halevy and Kofranek, 1977).
Problems with registration, however, led to the lack of STS-containing products
available to growers, wholesalers, and retailers. Recently, however, new
STS-containing products have been registered for use on cut flowers (G. Smith,
personal communication).
Due to previous problems with registration and to
environmental concerns over silver, researchers looked for a variety of other
anti-ethylene agents (Serek et al., 1995; Sisler et al., 1983, 1996). The
anti-ethylene agent 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP), initially developed at North
Carolina State University by Drs. Sister and Blankenship and further researched
by Drs. Reid, Nell, Serek and others, has been widely accepted by the
floriculture industry. Further research is needed to determine which species
will benefit from the use of STS and/or 1-MCP and the optimum rates and handling
procedures.
Storing cut stems in coolers benefits the grower,
wholesaler and florist by extending the production season, allowing storage of
excess production, improving production efficiency, and enabling long-term
shipment (Goszczynska and Rudnicki, 1988; Nowak and Rudnicki, 1990). Recommended
storage temperatures for cut flowers depend on the particular species and
cultivar, but generally vary between 0 and 4 ¬?C (32 and 29 ¬?F). Cut stems
could either be stored wet in water or preservative solution or dry in a
polyethylene plastic or wax-lined box.
Vase life can be extended by pretreatments and
pulses, which are short-term treatments (generally 24 h or less) conducted just
after harvest (Nowak and Rudnieki, 1990). A pretreatment may consist of placing
stems in heated water (approximately 38 >C [100 ¬?F]) or in a commercial
hydrating solution to enhance water absorption or
applying an anti-ethylene compound, such as STS or 1-MCP (Serek et al., 1995)
to prevent ethylene damage.
Cut stems may benefit from the addition of
sucrose in the vase solution to increase rate and number of buds opening,
improve petal coloration, and extend vase life (Halevy and Mayak, 1979; Nowak
and Rudnicki, 1990; Sacalis, 1993). Sucrose can be applied in pulse solutions of
0.5% to 25% from a few hours to 2 days or in vase solutions of 0.5% to 7% (Goszczynska
and Rudnicki, 1988). In addition, the vase life of many species is reduced when
stems are marketed in floral foam. Commercial products are typically used by
producers to provide the sucrose, acidifiers and antimicrobial agents required
during postharvest.
We have recently determined optimum postharvest
handling procedures for several specialty cut flowers (Bosma and Dole, 2002;
Redman eta!., 2001). For example, Campanula ‘Champion Blue’ and ‘Champion
Pink¬í stems can be stored at 2 ¬?C (36 ¬?F) either wet or dry with no
difference in vaselife (Bosma and Dole, 2002). Stems pretreated for 4 h with 38
¬?C (100 ¬?F) deionized floral solution [water adjusted to pH 3.5 with
citric acid plus 200 ppm 8-hydroxyquinoline citrate (8-HQC)] followed by a 5%
sucrose pulse solution produced the longest vase life (10.3 days) while
maintaining high quality. Stems had an average vase life of only 3.3 days when
placed in floral vase foam but lasted 10.0 days without foam. Many other new
specialty cut flower species require this postharvest research to reach their
full potential in the marketplace.
Objectives and Anticipated Benefits
The objectives of this research are to:
1. Screen new cut flower species/cultivars to
select those which have a long postharvest life
(Stage I).2. Determine optimum handling procedures to
extend the postharvest life of the most promising new
cut flower cultivars identified in Stage I (Stage
II). This includes determining ethylene sensitivity and optimum cold storage
duration, pretreatments and pulses, vase solutions and substrates, and
commercial preservatives for those species.
This research will decrease postharvest problems
traditionally associated with new specialty cut flowers and increase the use of
specialty cuts in the floriculture industry. For each species we will determine
if it is suitable for wholesale marketing or for direct retail only. The need
for new and different cut flowers is increasingly important to stimulate
customer interest and sales and to replace declining production of the major
greenhouse cut flower species. Domestic production of roses, carnations, and
chrysanthemums, which have been the mainstay of the cut flower industry for
years, continues to decline, while specialty cut flower production has increased
(USDA, 2000, 2001). Specialty cuts have been growing in popularity with the
industry and consumers for the last several years. Continued success of
specialty cut flowers requires the proper postharvest information for the new
species.
An advantage of this postharvest research is that
it will be conducted under the same system used to evaluate new species. Growing
conditions and protocols used to produce these cut flowers will be closely
monitored. and evaluated. It is our goal at North Carolina State University to
provide a complete evaluation system for new species from propagation to
postharvest. This postharvest research will be a critical component to these
evaluations.
Materials and Methods
The research process will consist of two stages.
Stage I. Each year 50 to 70 new cut flower cultivars are evaluated through the
ongoing ASCFG National Annual and Perennial Cut Flower Trial Programs,
administered by NCSU. During the evaluations we will conduct an initial
postharvest screening on the most promising 10 to 15 species/cultivars. Based on
producer recommendations, we will also evaluate other cultivars as time and
space allow. Since each new cultivar will be
available in limited quantities, only a few treatments can be conducted to
determine general postharvest suitability. Stage II. Four to five of the
most promising species from the previous year will be produced in large
quantities and subjected to extensive postharvest testing. Both Stage I and
Stage II work will be conducted in the first year; Stage II will rely on
promising species trialed in summer 2001: Asciepias, Eupatorium, Rudbeckia,
Papaver, and Viburnum.
Genera/procedures for Stages I and II. Cut
stems will be harvested, recut under water, and placed in the appropriate
treatments. Unless otherwise indicated, the floral solution used in all
experiments will be 22 ¬?C (72 ¬?F) deionized water adjusted to pH 3.5 using
citric acid plus 200 ppm 8-HQC. After treatment, stems will placed at 20¬±2 ¬?C
(68¬±4 ¬?F) under 75 to 100 umo*m-2*s-1 light for 12 hrs/day. Vase life after
removal from treatment and total solution uptake will be measured for each stem.
The pH and EC of solutions at beginning and end of treatment will be measured. A
completely randomized design will be used with 10 to 20 repetitions (flower
stems) per treatment; treatments arranged in a factorial where appropriate.
Stage I Treatments.
Cut stems of new cut flowers showing promising
production characteristics will be pretreated with either a commercial hydrating
solution or 22 ¬?C (72 t¬íF) floral solution and placed in either a
commercial holding solution or 22 ¬?C (72 F) floral solution.
Stage II Treatments.
Ethylene sensitivity.
Cut
stems will be placed in 22 ¬?C (72 F) floral solution and subjected to 0, 0.1 or
1.0 ppm ethylene in a flow-through system for 4 hrs. Stems will be pretreated
with STS, 1-MCP, or floral solution (control) prior to ethylene treatment.
Cold storage duration.
Cut
stems will be held 0, 1, 2, or 3 weeks in a 2 ¬?C (36 ¬?F) cooler (RH 80-90%)
either dry or wet. The 0 week storage stems will be placed directly into floral
vases.
At weeks 1, 2, and 3, fifteen stems will be
randomly selected from each treatment, recut under water, and placed in floral
vases filled with floral solution. All remaining stems will be recut under water
and placed back into their respective treatments.
Pretreatinents and pulses.
Cut
stems will receive three different 4 hour pretreatments: 1) floral solution
heated to 38 C (100 F) 2) 1-MCP and 22 “C (72 F) floral solution, or 3) 22
¬?C (72 F) flora! solution. After pretreatments, stems will receive a 24
hour pulse treatment of 0, 5, 10 or 20% sucrose in floral solution.
Vase solutions and substrates.
Cut
stems will be placed in vases with or without floral foam and in 0, 2, or 4%
sucrose floral solution.
Commercial preservatives.
Cut
stems will be pretreated with one of three solutions: two commercial hydrating
solutions or 22 C) (72 ¬?F) floral solution and placed in one of three holding
solutions: two commercial holding solutions or 22 ¬?C (72 ¬?F) floral solution.
Control solutions.
Cut
stems will be placed in 22 C) (72 F) 1) untreated tap water, 2) deionized water,
3) deionized water adjusted to pH 3.5 with citric acid, 4) deionized
water plus 200 ppm 8-HQC, or 5) deionized water adjusted to pH 3.5 with
citric acid plus 200 ppm 8-HQC.
Resources available.
North
Carolina State University has 6,600 ft2 of X.S. Smith greenhouses
with polyethylene plastic glazing available for young plant and finished
greenhouse cut flower production. The three units are 22 ft. x 100 ft. with gas
heat and HID lighting. Three controlled-temperature storage units with a minimum
of 286 ft area are dedicated to floriculture crops. Approximately 1 acre of
field space is available for production of field-grown cuts. In addition,
laboratory space is available for solution preparation, ethylene sensitivity
analysis, and holding area for vaselife determination.
Abeles, F.B., P.W. Morgan, and M.E. Saltveit, Jr.
1992. Ethylene in plant biology, 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego.
Beyer, Jr. E. 1976. A potent inhibitor of
ethylene action in plants. Plant Physiol. 58:268-271.
Bosma, T. and J. M. Dole. 2002. Postharvest
handling of cut Campanula flowers. HortScience (in press).
Dole, J. 2001a. 2000 ASCFG National Cut Flower
Seed Trials. The Cut Flower Quarterly. 13(1): 1-
10.
Dole, J. 2001b. 2000 ASCFG National Perennial
Trials. The Cut Flower Quarterly. 13(1): 12-19.
Dole, J. 2001c. Top-rated Field Cuts for 2001.
Grower Product News I 1(7):48, 50, 52-54.
Halevy, A.H. and A.M. Kofranek. 1977. Silver
treatment of carnations flowers for reducing ethylene damage and extending
longevity. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 102:76-77.
Halevy, A.H. and S. Mayak. 1979. Senescence and
postharvest physiology of cut flowers, Part 1. pp. 204-236. In: J. Janick (ed.).
Horticultural reviews. Vol. 1. AVI Publishing Company, Westport, Conn.
Goszczynska, D.M. and R.M. Rudnicki. 1988.
Storage of cut flowers. p. 35-62. In: 3. Janick (ed.). Horticultural reviews,
Vol. 10. AVI Publishing Company, Westport, Conn.
Nell, T.A., A. Suzucki, R.T. Leonard, i.E.
Barrett, D.G. Clark, and M.S. Reid. 2000. Developing protocols for cut flower
longevity. http://www.ednowment.org/projects/2000/nell2.html.
Nichols, R. 1966. Ethylene production during
senescence of flowers. 3. Hort. Sci. 41:279-290. Nowak, J. and R.M. Rudnicki.
1990. Postharvest handling and storage of cut flowers, florist greens,
and potted plants. Timber Press, Portland, Ore.
Redman, P.B., J.M. Dole, N.O. Maness, and J.A.
Anderson. 2001. Postharvest handling of nine specialty cut flower species. Scientia
Horticulturae (in press).
Sacalis, J.N. 1993. Cut flowers: prolonging
freshness. 2nd ed. Ball Publishing, Batavia, Ill. Serek, M., E.C.
Sisler, and M.S. Reid. 1995. Effects of 1-MCP on the vase life and ethylene
response of cut flowers. Plant Growth Regulat. 16: 93-97.
Sisler, E.C., M.S. Reid, and D.W. Fujino. 1983.
Investigation of the mode of ethylene in carnation senescence. Acta Hort.
141:229-234.Sisler, E.C., M. Serek, and E. Dupille. 1996.
Comparison of cyclopropene, 1-methylcyclopropene, and 3,3-dimethlcyclopropene
as ethylene antagonists in plants. Plant Growth Regulat.18:169-174.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).
2000. Floriculture crops summary. National Agriculture Statistics Service.
Washington, D.C.United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).
2001. Floriculture crops summary. National Agriculture Statistics Service.
Washington, D.C.Woltering, E.J. and W.G. van Doom. 1988. Role
of ethylene in senescence of petals -morphological and taxonomic
relationships. J. Expt. Bot. 39:1605-1616.
