Home : Archives : 1994 : 12 : The Development of Integrated Pest Management in Floriculture Progress Report December 1994

The Development of Integrated Pest Management in Floriculture Progress Report — December 1994

Date December 31, 1994

Title of Project Development and Implementation of Integrated Pest Management Strategies in Floriculture

Institution where work is being conducted University of California, Davis

Amount of Endowment rGrant$ 30,000
Covering Period 1/94 to 12/94

Anticipated Date of Project Completion/Final Report Project is ongoing.

Individual(s) Conducting Project:

(List Project Leader First)

Michael P. Parrella - Title Professor

Telephone Number (916) 752-0492

Development and Implementation of Integrated Pest Management Strategies in Floriculture

Michael P. Parrella

University of California, Davis

Progress Report to the American Floral Endowment, 12/31/94

A. Project Objectives:

1) a. Evaluate the potential of a new nematode species, Thripinema aptini

discovered in a rose growers range in California, for control of the western flower thrips.

Examine the feasibility of utilizing the predatory bug, Orius sp., the predaceous mite,

Amblyseius cucumeris. and the nematodes, Steinernema carpocapsae, for control of the

western flower thrips. Explore the basic biology of a new parasitoid discovered in

California (Ceranisus sp.) which attacks the western flower thrips; b. Continue the

evaluation of natural enemies, on a comparative basis, for biological control of selected

pests in greenhouses; c) Continue studies on the commercially available predator,

Chrysoperla spp. and the commercially available parasitoid, Aphidius solani, for aphid

control. e. Continue statewide implementation of an IPM/Biological control program for

potted chrysanthemums and expand this to cut chrysanthemums.

2) Continue the basic

biology of thrips in an effort to understand feeding, oviposition, and pupation behavior in

selected floriculture crops.

3) Continue the search for new pesticides which have

potential for use in floriculture and maintain contact with chemical manufacturers to

assure that the ornamental’s industry is not overlooked for potential registrations. Assist

in labeling materials for ornamentals and help fill in data gaps for materials undergoing

reregistration. Evaluate new and old pesticides for compatibility with selected natural

enemies in culture at UC Davis. Continue monitoring for insecticide resistance in the

western flower thrips and develop alternative strategies for controlling these arthropods

and for managing the development of resistance.

B. Major New Advances Over the Preceding Twelve Months:

Three major floriculture production areas in California were sampled in Nov.

1993 and in March and June 1994 for western flower thrips parasitized by the nematode

Thripinema aptini. This nematode was found parasitizing western flower thrips in 1993

(a new California record at that time) and we were interested in determining its general

prevalence in the state. In addition, we hoped to be able to determine if intraspecific

groups of this nematode were present in California The practical implication of this is

that if we found higher levels of western flower thrips parasitized by this nematode in

Santa Barbara vs. San Diego, there could be a genetic basis for this difference rather than

a simple environmental explanation. If this proved to be true, then rearing and

conducting experiments with the nematode strain from Santa Barbara (with its greater

inherent ability to parasitize western flower thrips) would be the path of choice.

Determining if genetic differences among these nematode populations exist in the state

requires genetic fingerprinting techniques that are reliable. As we started this work, there

were few such techniques developed for thrips, let alone the nematode species

parasitizing the thrips. It was necessary to develop these techniques.

Interestingly, populations of western flower thrips and their natural enemies were

highest in carnations produced in greenhouses in Santa Barbara county and in field grown

roses in Monterey county. The dominant natural enemies were the parasitic nematode, T.

aptini, and the two predators Orius tristicolor and Amblyseius sp. From these samples,

we selected groups of thrips parasitized by the nematode for genetic fingerprinting.

Preliminary experiments with the thrips and nematodes allowed the selection of 5 primers

(from Operon Technologies [Kit AT) and we then tested the reliability of the random

amplified polymorphic DNA technique (RAPDS)by comparing nematode and western

flower thrips RAPDs banding patterns. Data collected to date indicate that RAPDs is a

reliable technique for nematode fingerprinting if contamination and misrepresentation of

the presence or absence of bands is taken into consideration. To correct for

contamination, the western flower thrips from which the nematode was extracted is also

subjected to RAPDs. Any bands from the nematode and thrips that co-migrate are not

scored in the analysis. To correct for misrepresentation of the bands, the reaction is

repeated 4 times. Presently we are determining the validity of RAPDs by examining

banding patterns from a family of nematodes. However at this point, results are not

encouraging. The RAPDs fingerprints do not show a pattern of inheritance, which makes

it difficult to compare and contrast different nematode populations found throughout

California.

Weekly releases of the predators Orius sp. and Amblyseius cucumeris were made

into a commercial range of cut chrysanthemums where western flower thrips and Tomato

Spotted Wilt Virus was a problem. These natural enemies dramatically reduced thrips

populations when contrasted with control (no release) cages and with an adjacent grower

greenhouse under chemical control. However, populations of western flower and the

incidence of the virus were above acceptable levels. Other biological solutions to the

problem of western flower thrips on floriculture crops are needed. Data are still being

analyzed from this trial and we hope to extract information on the spatial distribution of

western flower thrips as a function of planting date; this will be used to develop

population and decision level sampling plans for this pest.

Biological studies were initiated with the parasite Ceranisus sp.. In addition, we

sent this species to cooperating scientists in the Netherlands (Agriculture University,

Wageningen) where they are comparing members of this genus from around the world.

The objective is to determine if there is a ‘best’ Ceranisus to use in biological control

trials. Our studies have shown that this parasite prefers to attack early stages of the thrips

although we have found that the first pupal stage parasitized. The implication here is that

this natural enemy may behave in a way that is similar to Amblyseias cucumeris which

also attacks only 1st and early 2nd instars of the western flower thrips.

We continue to make great strides in our evaluation of natural enemies for

whitefly control. (see publication #s 1-7). When we publish articles every effort is made

to publish in scientific journals (i.e., Environmental Entomology) and then extract

information from these to publish in grower oriented magazines (i.e., Greenhouse

Grower, California Agriculture). We continue to evaluate new natural enemies in a

cooperative agreement with the USDA, APHIS laboratory in Mission, Texas and with the

California Department of Food and Agriculture in Sacramento, CA. Data on at least 7

‘new’ natural enemies are being analyzed at this time. In addition, we are in the process

of evaluating and comparing several different species of fungi (Paecilomyces, Beauveria,

and Metarhizium) for whitefly control.

Weekly releases of the predators Chrysoperla rufilabris and Aphidius solani were

made into a commercial range of cut chrysanthemums where aphids were serious

problems. Release rates suggested by commercial insectaries were used and releases

were initiated when aphids were first observed in the crop. Unfortunately, aphid

populations quickly zoomed out of control. We even tried to reduce the aphid

populations with repeated application of selective insecticides (soap and kinoprene) but

this did not result in acceptable aphid control. This chrysanthemum crop represented a

worst case scenario with 4 species of aphids present on the chrysanthemums and

emigration a constant problem. In such a situation, other strategies (including new

biological control agents) are needed. Studies on a much smaller scale have shown that

the convergent lady beetle has the potential to control aphids on potted chrysanthemums

(publication # 8).

Research has continued with developing a predictable biological control program

for chrysanthemums (see publication #9). We routinely send leafminer parasites to

cooperating growers in San Diego, Santa Barbara and Salinas who try them on a number

of leafminer sensitive crops with the advice provided by our system. We can achieve

reliable biological control of leafminers; on chrysanthemums. Successful strategies for

the biological control of other pests, such as aphids and western flower thrips, must be

added to this model before a complete program can be presented to growers.

Insect growth regulators (IGRs) offer the potential to control the silverleaf

whitefly and may fit well into an integrated pest management program. Many of these

materials have characteristics that are favorable for an insecticide in the 1990s: low

mammalian toxicity, reduced residual activity, short re-entry intervals after application,

no hazard to the health and safety of farm workers, lack of problems with ground water

contamination, good activity against the target pest, compatibility with natural enemies,

and no impact on non-target organisms. Although it is rare to find all these qualities in a

single material, the IGRs (and particularly the juvenoids) are gaining a great deal of

attention. Many of these materials are used for whitefly control in other parts of the

world (Europe, Japan, Israel, etc.) and registration is being pursued for some of these

materials in the United States. We evaluated four insect growth regulators (buprofezin,

pyriproxifen, kinoprene and fenoxycarb) for their ability to kill the various immature

stages of the silverleaf whitefly and for their potential compatibility with natural enemies

of this pest. The materials buprofezin and pyriproxipfen provided the best control, and

activity was highest against the early instars of the whitefly. Such limited activity

suggests that these products, acting alone, may be insufficient to control the silverleaf

whitefly. However, if the materials are compatible with the natural enemy complex

attacking this pest, then these IGRs may fit into an IPM program where both the natural

enemy complex and the insecticide cause mortality to the whiteflies. Adult parasitoids

readily oviposited in whiteflies treated with any IGR and parasitoid emergence was

recorded from all treatments. However, only pyriproxifen showed no significant

difference in parasitoid emergence when compared to the control. We are still in the

process of evaluating the viability of these treated parasitoids. Similar results were found

when these materials were evaluated for compatibility with a predatory coccinelid beetle.

Only pyriproxifen was found to have no impact on larval development or adult longevity.

C. Future Plans Covered by the Endowment Grant:

Large trials are planned with biological/IPM programs in chrysanthemums,

poinsettias and other crops where we will be testing the most effective natural enemies

for control of whiteflies and thrips. These trials will be done with cooperating growers as

well as in my greenhouses on the Davis campus. As discussed above, we are particularly

interested in examining the interactions of different natural enemies used simultaneously

for biological control. Considerable research will concentrate on the new natural enemies

of western flower thrips. Detailed studies with many floriculture pests and their natural

enemies will continue — the more data we have the better we are able to formulate control

IPM strategies using either pesticides, natural enemies or a combination of the two. The

amount of time and effort that goes into studying biology in this project should not be

underestimated because a good portion of the 6 graduate students supported by this AFE

grant have basic biology as an important component of their Master’s and Ph.D. work.

Research with new ‘biorational’ and other pesticides will continue in an effort to generate

data required for registration. Compatibility studies with natural enemies will also

continue.

D. Anticipated Benefits for Floral Industry:

This AFE project is designed to provide flower growers with components of an

IPM program which can be applied in their operations for the purpose of maintaining

quality of production while reducing the pesticide use. This is accomplished at two

levels: 1) some data generated by the project is of immediate use to growers (pesticide

efficacy, information on basic biology in relation to pesticide efficacy, how to estimate

pest populations in the greenhouse, evaluation of commercially available natural enemies,

etc.) and can be applied to production facilities without delay, and 2) other data is being

compiled which focuses on the development of a more complete system where biological

control is a major component of an IPM program for floriculture crops. While this data is

;1800fnot of immediate use to growers (for example, some of the natural enemies we are

working with for biological control of the silverleaf whitefly and western flower thrips

are not yet available commercially) we are building the knowledge base for a fully

integrated pest control program that can be adopted by growers in years to come.

E. Recent Publications as a Result of AFE Support:

1. Heinz, K. M., J. Brazzle, C. H. Picket, E. T. Natwick, J. M. Nelson, and M. P.

Parrella. 1994. Delphastus pusillus as a potential biological control agent of

sweetpotato (silverleaf) whitefly. California Agriculture 48(2): 35-40.

2. Heinz, K. M. and M. P. Parrella. 1994. Biological control of Bemisia argentifolii

(Gennadius) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) infesting Euphorbia Pulcherrima:

evaluations of releases of Encarsia luteola Howard (Hymenoptera; Aphelinidae) and

Delphastuspusillus LeConte (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Environmental.

Entomology (in press).

3. Heinz, K. M., and M. P. Parrella. 1994. Biological control of silverleaf whitefly on

poinsettia. California Agriculture. (in press).

4. Heinz, K. M. and M. P. Parrella. 1994. Poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima Wind. ex.

Koltz) cultivar-mediated differences in performance of five natural enemies of

Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Biological Control (in

press).

5 & 6. Heinz, K. M. and M. P. Parrella. 1994. Parasites and predators control

silverleaf whitefly infesting poinsettia greenhouses. Greenhouse Grower ( 2

articles in press in 2 successive issues of the magazine).

7. Nelson, J. and M. P. Parrella. 1994. Goodbye to Whitefly. Greenhouse Grower 12

(10): 98 - 103.

8. Flint, M. L., S. H. Driestadt, and M. P. Parrella. 1994. Releases of convergent lady

beetle can control aphids on potted plants. California Agriculture (in press).

9. Heinz, K. M., L. Nunney, and M. P. Parrella. 1993. Toward predictable biological

control of Liriomyza trifolii (Diptera: Agrornyzidae) infesting greenhouse

chrysanthemums. Environmental Entomiology 22: 1217 - 1233.