Home : Archives : 1994 : 09 : Insecticidal Controlled Atmosphere for Management of Sweetpotato Whitefly Progress Report September 1994

Insecticidal Controlled Atmosphere for Management of Sweetpotato Whitefly Progress Report — September 1994

Date August 22, 1994

Title of Project Insecticidal Controlled Atmosphere for Management of Silverleaf Whitefly

Institution where work is being conducted University of Massachusetts-Amherst

Amount of Endowment Grant $ 6,000
Covering Period Jan. 94 to Dec. 94

Anticipated Date of Project Completion/Final Report Dec. 95

Individual(s) conducting Project:

(List Project Leader First)

Susan S. Han - Title Assistant Professor

Telephone Number (413) 545-5228

Insecticidal Controlled Atmosphere for Management of Silverleaf Whitefly

Susan S. Han

University of Massachusetts

Progress Report to the American Floral Endowment, 8/22/94

A. Project Objectives:

We have previously reported that reduced-O2 controlled atmospheres (CA) effectively control various stages of

greenhouse whitefly (Trialeurodes vaporarium) as well as the adult stage of silverleaf whitefly (see previous progress

reports). This method leaves no chemical residues, is safe to handle, and is environmentally safe. The objectives of this

study were to test (1) the effectiveness of short-term reduced 02 controlled atmospheres on various stages of the more

damaging silverleaf whitefly; and (2) the effects of controlled atmospheres on different developmental stages of

poinsettias.

B. Results to Date:

To investigate the effects of controlled atmosphere on various stages of whitefly, infested, excised poinsettia

leaves were collected from the greenhouse at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Leaves were then placed in

vials containing water and treated with a constant flow of air or with factory-mixed N2 (containing =2ppm O2).

Following the gas treatments, leaves were maintained in a 20′C growth chamber with 12 hour of light (17 ¬± 3 uMOL*s-1

m-2) provided by cool-white fluorescent lamps. Results showed that a 4-hr reduced-O2 treatment resulted in limited

control of the eggs, nymphs and pupae of silverleaf whitefly (Fig. 1). In comparison, an 8-hr treatment prevented 20%

of the eggs and pupae from further

development and killed 80% of the

nymphs.

We had previously reported

no differences in growth and

development of rooted cuttings

treated with air or reduced O2 for 8 hr

at 20′C. In our present studies, we

have found that repeated treatment of

rooted cuttings (up to 3 times), did

not affect the growth of the cuttings

(data not shown). In addition,

unrooted cuttings of 6 cultivars were

treated to determine if the reduced-O2

treatment would affect the rooting

potential. Treatments were also

performed on the flowering stage in order to explore the possibility of using this technique to quarantine saleable

plants. Four weeks after the CA treatment, no differences in root or vegetative growth were detected between unrooted

cuttings treated with air or with low O2 (data not shown). Considerable differences, however, existed between cultivars

when plants were treated at the flowering stage (Table 1). Symptoms of phytotoxicity, evident as areas of discoloration

on the bracts, typically appeared 24 to 48 hours after the treatment. Of the six cultivars tested, ‘Annette Hegg’ was

most sensitive to the treatment followed

by ‘Freedom’. Minimal phytotoxicity

occurred on the other cultivars.

Experiments conducted to date thus

indicate that low-O2 CA can be used for

disinfestation of both greenhouse and

silverleaf whitefly on unrooted and rooted

cuttings of poinsettias. However,

selection of plants for their tolerance to

the low-O2 treatment would be necessary

if the technique is to be employed on

fully-colored plants.

Table 1. Susceptibility of bracts of six cultivars of poinsettias to the 8 hr,

low-O2 treatment. The degree of phytotoxicity was visually estimated, at

10% increments. as the percentage of total bract area with discoloration.

Data were collected 2 days after the treatment and are means +/- SE.

Cultivar Phytotoxicity Cultivar Phytotoxicity
(%)^z (%)^z
Celebrate II 0.1c^y Pink Peppermint 0.3c
Freedom 7.Ob Supjibi 4.1c
Hegg. Red 31.4a V-14 Glory 1.1c
^z Percentage of area with symptoms of phytotoxicity.
^y Means separated by Duncan’s multiple test, P=0.05.

C. Anticipated Benefits for Floral Industry:

The proposed method of

reduced-O2 insecticidal CA would provide the greenhouse industry with an environmentally-safe means of controlling

the spread of whitefly through infested plant material. The integration of this technique with an IPM program would

drastically reduce the use of hazardous pesticides, and would increase profitability to the greenhouse industry by

reducing pesticide costs and increasing the quality of the product.