Home : Archives : 1992 : 06 : Physiological and hormonal Factors Related to Longevity of Flowering Potted Plants 1992 Proposal

Physiological and hormonal Factors Related to Longevity of Flowering Potted Plants 1992 Proposal

PHYSIOLOGICAL AND HORMONAL FACTORS RELATED TO LONGEVITY

OF FLOWERING POTTED PLANTS

Terril A. Nell and James E. Barrett

Environmental Horticulture Department

University of Florida

Gainesville, FL 32611

1992

This project will investigate the physiological factors that affect

decline of flowering potted plants indoors. These factors involve

production practices, shipping and handling procedures, and indoor

environment as related to the grower, wholesaler, retailer and consumer

as related to internal changes in sucrose, glucose and fructose.

Our new greenhouse/laboratory facilities have thirteen environmentally

controlled interior simulation rooms for conducting postharvest research

on floriculture crops. This project has provided information on the

differences in longevity for several chrysanthemum and poinsettia

cultivars, the influence of fertilization and light level during production

on longevity and the importance of proper shipping and holding environments

for several floriculture species. Also, flower respiration after

17 days indoors has been related to longevity of several chrysanthemum

varieties, Our objective is to identify physiological parameters

related to increased longevity. The long range benefit of this work

is that all the industry will have a better understanding of how to produce

and handle floriculture crops to provide a more desirable product

that will last longer for the consumer.

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Quality will characterize business success in the 1990s, according to

numerous consumer and marketing experts. The floriculture industry

is no exception! Flowering plants are in direct competition with

a multitude of other discretionary purchase items, and if floral sales

are to increase, consumers must be satisfied with the flowers they

buy.

In today’s market, florists and mass market buyers are demanding

flowering plants that demonstrate increased performance, as well

as attractive physical characteristics. Repeat consumer purchases

are discouraged by flowering plants that fade, wither and die under ordinary

interior conditions. So emphasis in the 1990s will focus on producing

plants that are durable, resilient and long lasting, as well as beautiful.

Today, 75 percent of pot mums are sold through supermarkets, according

to a recent study by Yoder Brothers. Floral buyers consider in-store

and in-home keeping quality to be among the most important attributes

in floral products.

Variation in production practices results in considerable variation

in longevity of flowering potted plants produced by different growers.

Modifying production and handling practices can improve flowering

plants for the consumer. Production environment, cultural practices and

variety significantly impact longevity and quality. Growers manipulate

production temperature and light levels to maximize root development,

increase branching and - with the use of DIF (relationship of day and night

temperatures) - control plant height, thus ensuring good production

quality. Research has demonstrated that growers can also use some

cultural and environmental conditions to increase postproduction quality

and longevity.

REVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT LITERATURE

Good growers build quality into their plants from the time they

select varieties until they ship plants from the greenhouse to the

retail store. Each decision about variety selection, cultural practices,

production environment, storage, transport conditions and retail environment

can have a major impact on plant longevity. Quality is achievable

by establishing the factors and conditions affecting quality and

then incorporating these specific criteria into production protocols. Achieving

quality doesn’t necessarily mean increasing cost.

Growers can virtually assure flowering potted plant longevity

by selecting varieties known to tolerate low interior light conditions

well. More resilient varieties have less bud and leaf drop and leaf

yellowing and increased flower longevity under interior conditions when

compared to other varieties (9). Interior longevity of chrysanthemum

varieties, for instance, may vary by as much as two weeks due to leaf

yellowing, flower fading or decline (13). Similarly, poinsettia leaf drop

varies from 20 to 90 percent over a 30-day interior period depending

on variety (11).

Production practices have long been oriented toward producing

plants sized to respond to designated markets. Product size will

continue to be important. But growers should be simultaneously modifying

environmental conditions and production practices to increase longevity,

as well. Modifying environmental conditions to improve interior longevity

doesn’t necessarily mean incurring additional production costs. Reducing

temperatures during the final two to three production weeks intensifies

flower and bract colors. If DIF is used to control plant height,

use of either a zero DIF or a slightly positive DIF during the final

two to three production weeks is best to enhance longevity (15). High night

temperatures during the final 2-3 weeks of a poinsettia crop may

contribute to bract edge burn since these temperatures promote rapid

bract enlargement.

Production light levels are also important in extending flowering

potted plant longevity (5, 9, 15). Unlike potted foliage plants where

a low light acclimatization period reduces leaf drop, work in the United

States and Europe has demonstrated that high light levels reduce bud drop

and increase interior performance of chrysanthemums, Christmas begonias,

poinsettias and other flowering plants (5, 9). Symptoms of low production

light levels include more flower and bud drop, premature cyathia drop and

shortened interior longevity. In the northern United States, using high

intensity lighting to optimize longevity during the winter months

may be essential to obtain plant size, as well as to develop a plant with

good longevity.

Fertilization practices affect longevty, also (6, 7, 8, 10, 12,

16). Reducing fertilizer levels increases longevity without affecting

plant marketability. In many cases, the amount of water applied at each

watering necessitates high fertilizer levels. Reducing fertilizer level

is difficult for some growers to accept initially, but growers who

have lowered fertilizer levels have increased postproduction longevity

without detrimental effects on crop marketability.

Our program at the University of Florida has investigated effects

of terminating fertilizer during the final two to three production

weeks (8). Stopping fertilizer applications during the final production

stages increased chrysanthemum longevity and reduced incidence of

bract edge burn of Gutbier V-14 Glory poinsettia (12). With Easter

lilies, however, preliminary work has indicated that fertilizer termination

isn’t beneficial, so fertilizer applications must be continued until

this crop is marketed to avoid premature leaf yellowing. Success

of fertilizer termination for each grower is determined by fertilizer levels

used, growing media and crop. Growers currently using high fertilizer

levels throughout the entire production period will experience greater

benefits than growers already using optimum fertilizer levels or reducing

fertilizer levels at the end of the crop. Basically, terminating

fertilizer reduces the soluble salt level in the growing medium and

prevents excessive elemental (salt) buildup in the plant. Nitrogen and

potassium sources used in fertilizer programs also affect longevity.

Longevity of most flowering potted plants is greatest when 60 to

70 percent of the nitrogen is from nitrate sources and the remainder from

either ammonium or nitrate sources (Roude).

Also, some growers have altered the nitrogen-to-potassium ratio

at the end of the crop to extend longevity. There doesn’t appear

to be any benefit from this procedure, but it may be beneficial to switch

from fertilizers containing ammonium nitrogen and low calcium and potassium

nitrate during the final two to three production weeks.

Growing medium also influences postproduction performance of flowering

potted plants. The medium should provide good aeration and nutrient

holding capacity during production and maximum water holding capacity

during postproduction to minimize drying out during retail and consumer

phases. Wetting agents applied at time of marketing allow for uniform

watering during postproduction thus, reducing moisture stress and

increasing longevity.

The research results summarized above demonstrate that growers

have numerous opportunities to improve longevity of flowering potted

plants. However, specific cultural modifications depend on plant

species and variety. Thus, it is imperative that the physiological and

hormonal changes involved in these responses be better understood

so that recommendations can be made for a large number of plant species.

For instance, in cut flowers, use of a sugar based preservative

is nearly a universal recommendation due to increased carbohydrate

supply to the flower. Similarly, light compensation point has been

a useful indicator of the interior performance of foliage plants. In flowering

plants, hormonal control of bud/flower drop in some species has been

related to ethylene (1, 2, 3, 4) but the role of carbohydrates is

unclear. In our previous work with hibiscus, poinsettia and chrysanthemums,

carbohydrate levels were not strongly related to flower longevity or bud

drop. However, respiration of chrysanthemum flowers was correlated

with flower longevity after 17 days under interior conditions - the

longest lasting varieties had the lowest respiration levels. These results

with chrysanthemum suggest a role of carbohydrates even though levels

of non-structural carbohydrates in long and short lasting varieties

were similar. Carbohydrate levels may be an indication that 1) sugars are

not being translocated from leaves and stems to the flower, 2) sugars

have little, if any, significance in flowering plant longevity, or 3)

presence of threshold levels in certain varieties which allow long lasting

varieties to more efficiently utilize available sugars. Identification

of the factors involved in flowering potted plant longevity will advance

the industry’s ability to provide better quality, longer lasting

plants to the consumer.

OBJECTIVES

1. To relate physiological parameters (photosynthesis, dark respiration,

carbohydrate levels, etc) to increased longevity of flowering potted

plants. 2. To identify cultural practices which improve flowering

potted plant longevity, as related to physiological or hormonal changes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A number of studies will be conducted with chrysanthemum, poinsettia

and potted rose as part of this project. Plants will be grown in

a fiberglass, fan and pad cooled greenhouse, or in air conditioned

greenhouses at the University of Florida, Gainesville, using standard commercial

production practices for each crop.

A. Factors related to cyathia bud drop Our work over the

last 2 years has related some differences in sucrose, fructose and glucose

levels in ‘Annette Hegg Lady’ and ‘Gutbier V-14 Glory’ to cyathia chop,

but a strong relationship was not present. In the current study,

we will expand this work using additional poinsettia varieties and

production conditions to further identify the factors involved in cyathia

drop.

1. Poinsettia plants will be grown to anthesis, then moved to

our interior rooms at standard conditions of 70 ft-c., 12 hours daily

and 70′F and 55% relative humidity. Carbohydrate and starch levels

will be related to cyathia bud drop at each sampling time. Cyathia, leaf,

stem and bract tissue will be collected at anthesis and weekly after plants

are moved into interior conditions. Samples will be oven dried at

70′C and then ground in a Wiley Mill. Sugars will be extracted from

the ground tissue by boiling in an 80% ethanol solution for 20 minutes.

The separation of fructose, glucose and sucrose will be performed by gas

chromatography techniques using trimethylsilylation derivatives.

2. Poinsettias ‘Lilo’, ‘Subjibi’ and ‘Freedom’ will be grown at

65′F night/75′F day and 72′F night/82′F day from planting to anthesis.

Cyathia buds will be collected and analyzed for carbohydrates as

outlined above. Cyathia bud drop will be determined weekly after

plants are moved indoors.

B. Relationship of Production temperature to carbohydrate levels

and longevity

Chrysanthemums ‘Tara’ and ‘Boaldi’ will be grown at 65′F night/75′F

day or 72′F night/82′F day from planting to flower. At flowering,

flower, stem and leaf samples will be taken for analysis of sucrose,

glucose and fructose using procedures outlined above. An additional group

of plants will be moved to interior rooms for evaluation of longevity.

This study will be repeated and additional samples taken for carbohydrate

analysis, pending the results of the first study.

C. Relationship of Supra-optimal carbohydrate levels to longevity

Potted roses and carnations will be grown to marketable stage

then moved to interior rooms. Carbohydrate levels will be boosted

in the plants by injecting sucrose into the stems either 1) during

the final 2 weeks of production, 2) during the entire interior period,

3) a combination of 1 and 2 or 4) no additional sucrose. Carbohydrate

levels, flower respiration, bud drop and flowering longevity will

be determined

FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE

The Environmental Horticulture greenhouses, laboratories, and

interior simulation rooms will be used for this project. Laboratory

facilities include 13 environmentally controlled postproduction rooms,

5 rooms for simulated shipping, and equipment for photosynthesis and respiration

measurements, carbohydrate analysis and colorometric procedures.

BUDGET

This project will include our work (T. A. Nell and J. E. Barrett),

R. T. Leonard (state supported

biological scientist assigned to Terril Nell), and two Doctoral

students.

Supplies, greenhouse and interior space, laboratory chemicals

$6000

Labor for assistance in growing plants, analyzing plant tissue,

and taking and analyzing data 9000

New columns/parts for gas chromatograph 1500

TOTAL 16,500

REFERENCES

1. Agnew, N. H, M. L. Albrecht and R. K Kimmins. 1985. Reducing

corolla abscission of

Streptocarpus X hybrids under simulated shipping conditions with

silver thiosulfate. HortScience

20:118-119.

2. Cameron, Arthur C. and Michael S. Reid. 1983. Use of silver

thiosulfate to prevent flower

abscission from potted plants. Scientia Horticulturae. 19: 373-378.

3. Hammer, A., R. Larson, M. Reid, J. Sacalis, M. Saltreit, and

G. Staby. 1981. How to reduce

petiole bending of poinsettia plants. Ohio Florists’ Assn. Bull.

626.

4. Halevy, A. H. and A. M. Kofranek. 1976. The prevention of

flower and leaf abscission in pot roses

during simulated transport. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 101:658-660.

5. Nell, T. A., J. J. Allen, J. N. Joiner, and L. G. Albrigo.

1982. Light, fertilizer and water level effects

on growth, yield and nutrient composition and light compensation

point of chrysanthemum.

HortScience 6:222-223.

6. Nell, T. A. and J. E. Barrett. 1984. Postproduction longevity

of flowering potted chrysanthemums

as affected by simulated shipping and holding room temperatures.

HortScience 19:567.

7. Nell, T. A. and J. E. Barrett. 1984. How to control bract

necrosis. Greenhouse Grower. 2:42,

44, 56, 57.

8. Nell, T. A., M. T. Leonard and J. E. Barrett. 1989. Fertilizer

Termination Affect Longevity of Potted

Chrysanthemum. HortScience 24:996-999.

9. Nell, T. A., M. T. Leonard and J. E. Barrett. 1990. Production

and Post-Production Irradiance

Affects Acclimatization and Longevity of Potted Chrysanthemums

and Poinsettias. J. Amer. Soc.

Hort. Sci. 115:262-265.

10. Nell, T. A. 1990. Commercial transport of flowering potted

plants. Grower Talks 53(9):24-39.

11. Nell, T. A. and J. E. Barrett. 1990. Flowering Potted Plants,

Maximizing Longevity. SAF. October

20-22.

12. Nell, T. A. and J. E. Barrett. 1991. Plan now to eliminate

bract edge burn in your ‘91 poinsettias.

GrowerTalks 54:18-19.

13. Nell, T. A.. 1991. How to make long lasting top performers

out of your pot mums. GrowerTalks

54:67-80.

14. Scott, L. F., T. M. Blessington, and J. A. Price. 1984. Influence

of controlled release fertilizers,

storage duration and light source on postharvest quality of poinsettia.

HortScience. 19:111-112.

15. Staby, G. L. and A. M. Kofranek. 1979. Production conditions

as they affect harvest and

postharvest characteristics of poinsettias. J. Amer. Soc. Hort.

Sci. 104:88-92.

16. Wesenberg, B. G. and G. E. Beck. 1964. Influence of production

environment and other factors

on the longevity of potted chrysanthemum flowers (Chrysanthemum

morifolium Ramat.) Proc.

Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 85:584-590.